External
Occipital
Protuberance

Headlines

Entertainment

Nerd Alert!

Sports

OUR
so-called
SPORT

Brain Candy

Jeff's Head

John's Head

Rob's Head

Contact Us


 

Nerd Alert!


SEASON ONE

May 22, 2007

How to Stop an Exploding Man

I have to say I'm disappointed that we still didn't get the big Sylar vs. Peter superpowered throwdown they've teased us with all season. When they showed Fire vs. Cold in the future episode and didn't show the actual fight to us, I figured it was because they were saving it for the Showdown in Kirby Park. Instead all we get were a few jump cut edited punches and then Hiro running Sylar through. Weak! Is there not enough money in the Heroes production budget to do an all out Sylar vs. Peter fight?

Richard Roundtree being able to see Peter and having the talk with him was neat, but not so neat was the lack of explanation as to how it happened. Was it the past? Was it a dream? I'm working on the theory now that he might be the man who can see Molly.

Molly and Micah seem to be a natural pair. A cute little superpowered white girl just like his superpowered old man has. But those kids can't be more than 10 or 11, they shouldn't be expected to end up as a couple unless they want to move into Cory and Topanga territory.

I feel a little bit like pointing out some of the dumb stuff in the episode, like the entire conversation Richard Roundtree had with Mother Petrelli where Mother goes through the entire motion of putting sugar in her tea and then immediately gets up, kisses him goodbye on the forehead and walks off. Who does that? Who sits down, pours herself tea during a conversation, mixes the sugar, and then gets up to leave immediately? "Well, I've sweetened the tea just how I like it. Gotta go." I'm making a big deal about that but I notice stuff like that, which is why I'm always railing about how dumb and badly directed Heroes is.

But I don't feel like complaining. What's the point? How many times must I say Heroes is a bad show that is inexplicably popular? The season finale was definitely on a par with the rest of the season. Most people see that as a huge positive and I don't feel like walking against the wind yet again.

I did like Nathan making the Heroic sacrifice and flying his brother to explode in the sky. No doubt Peter survived, but I'll miss Nathan. He was one of my favorites. Too bad he spent his whole life rejecting his cool (Claire's totally right) power of flight and decided to use it as a means to kill himself, even if he does save New York in the process. I wonder how his wife who can now walk and their two sons who never talk will have the news broken to them? "How did Nathan die?" "Well, he flew Peter into the sky so he could explode." And who gets to be Congressman with Nathan's demise? So many questions.

In the end, Noah Bennett has Claire back and they're okay. I like that. Those two are my favorites. The Hawkins-Sanders family is together, although I don't think DL will end up biting it. Nor will Matt Parkman. Eh. Whatever. Ando is back in Japan. That's cool. Mohinder and Mohinder's voice over narration are still around. I suppose I'll have to tolerate both some more in season 2. Peter will be back, Sylar will be back, and there's gonna be a new evil to fight. All good stuff.

The coda of Hiro in 1671 Japan was neat. I'd like to see more of what goes on there. But will someone finally explain what the significance of the eclipse is?

May 21, 2007

Gave myself a mini Heroes marathon of the last two episodes to prep for the big finale tonight.

What is it with this show and leaving bloody corpses on the floor for days and days? No one has cleaned up Issac in like three episodes. I mean, his corpse must be gathering flies and must stink to high Heaven, but people just hang out in his loft and ignore him. Now Sylar's mother is another corpse on the floor in her apartment. And add two more with Linderman and DL's corpses. Oh and Eric Roberts too. No one on Heroes practices the rule on Lost island where if you kill someone, you're responsible for burying the body. It's just good form.

So Nathan's crippled wife comes home with their two sons while Claire is still living there and they never ran into each other? The Petrelli mansion seems big but it can't be that big. It's not like there's a Nathancave underneath the house for Claire to duck into. Claire and Peter weren't exactly skulking around. It didn't seem like Nathan ever mentioned his illegitimate daughter to his wife either. Wonder if Nathan has a butler: "I've seen a lot of strange things in this house, sir..."

Creepy Alert: When Micah figured out the shapeshifter wasn't his mom and made a break for it. Then she lures him back while wearing a towel and makes the creepy threat: "I could show you things that would screw you up for life." Me, I'd call that bluff but I'm not a ten year old.

I liked the part where Hiro finds Nathan on the street and then yells that he's a villain. With Hiro's accent, it sounded like "You are virile! Virile!" Nathan should have turned to the reporters with a grin: "Yes, it's true. This Japanese boy says I'm virile."

Hiro is apparently the greatest student of swordsmanship ever since he can become a master swordsman in one afternoon. Duncan and Connor MacLeod both should be ashamed of their immortal selves for how long it took them to become adept swordsmen compared to the moon-faced Japanese kid who can stop time.

Fun dialogue where Claire considered going on patrol helping people in need while Peter frowned on the idea of wearing a costume with his underwear outside of his pants. I also liked the nuclear guy when they ran from Sylar. "Who's Sylar?" Good that Peter and Claire filled him in. It's always best to know who it is that's gonna kill you. No one will miss nuclear man.

So the shapeshifter waits until she's in the voting booth with Micah before she describes to Micah the plan where he has to interface with the network and change the votes for Nathan? Nor are they whispering or anything. Meanwhile they cut to an overhead shot and show the voting booths are incredibly cramped and there are people on either side of them. Yet of course the people on either side don't hear them. This is just one example of the rampant kind of stupid lack-of-attention-to-detail crap that I hate about this show.

When Jessica and DL showed up in Nathan's office, it's for the best DL didn't question why Nathan said that he didn't think he'd see her again. I mean, that may be Jessica in control of Niki's body, but it's still Niki's body he had sex with. A throwdown with DL in his office is the last thing Nathan needed right when he just won the election in a landslide. But what was the big mystery about where Linderman is? He's in his office building in "Kirby Plaza" where the security guard is named "Stan". Why didn't they check there first?

I'm still a detractor of this show. By that I mean, I still think it mostly kind of blows. But I'm curious to see how this whole thing shakes out tonight.

February 7, 2007

Distractions

The most distracting thing about Heroes (besides Claire Bennet = jail for me) is how bad it still is most of the time.  I know my Heroes naysaying isn't popular but I have to say my nays.

So Claire is Italian? She's a Petrelli and I'm not sure what her mom is. (Although Jessalyn Gilsig was a neat casting choice.  I miss her as Gina calling Christian nothing but "asshole" on Nip/Tuck.)  Anyway, Claire sure doesn't look Italian. Peter has the hots for his neice.

You know what I don't get? Horned Rimmed's relationship with his wife. Why did he marry her and how can he continually have the Haitian mind blank her and keep her lobotomized? And what's with Claire's brother, who has no purpose on the show except to conveniently cause problems for Claire and be written out otherwise? That whole family unit is poorly conceived, badly written, and nonsensical.

The first five minutes of Heroes pissed me off right good. So Peter and Dr. Who walk down the crowded streets of Manhattan, both invisible, and they bump into people as they go. They show us the POV of them invisible with people getting jostled by them, or Dr. Who will steal a pretzel, which floats into thin air and vanishes into his coat, which is invisible, so anything that disappears into his invisible coat is also invisible? Is that how that works? And then despite these unseen things knocking people around, the people have no reaction! Worst of all, the whole time the two of them are talking loudly about a bomb going off in Manhattan. And the people around them have no reaction. They don't hear them? Since when does 'invisible' mean 'inaudible'?!

George Takei tracking his son down halfway around the world, yelling at him for disappearing and then offering him an executive vice presidency? WHAT?! That makes no sense, regardless of how it played out that his sister was smarter and got the job. It was all dumb ass cliches.

This is the type of crap on this show that drives me nuts. Retarded stuff like this, really sloppy writing and directing, takes me out of the show. And I want to like this show but I have to shut my brain off to watch it. The best aspects of Heroes (Claire, Hiro, Nathan, Sylar) still don't compensate for or overcome how dumb it is to me.

On the other hand: No Matt Parkman (who bores me, and so does his wife) and best of all no Mohinder were big plusses. Other minuses: "Touching" moments with Issac and Simone. Ecchhh.

Make the show about Nathan, Claire, Hiro, Ando, Horn Rimmed, Sylar, Invisible Dr. Who, and George Takei and kill off everyone else and Heroes would be vastly improved.

Tenken347 on The W message board  replied to the above post, re: "invisible" means "inaudible":

Well, that has been depicted as part of his abilities since they introduced his character, but if you want me to no-prize it out for you, here goes. Dr. Who's ability is a sort of super camoflage that prevents him from being detected by normal humans. It affects both their ability to see and hear him. Hell, let's go the whole nine yards and presume that it also exerts a mild mental effect on the people around him, preventing them from thinking too hard about what's going on. We've already had a girl regenerate from her own autopsy, so I don't find this that hard to buy into.

And my retort:

You know, I will buy that explanation. That actually works for me. But it would be much better if Heroes explains it rather than fans coming up with their own answers.

For instance, and this has been annoying me for months, Nathan Petrelli. He can fly. And he can fly at incredibly fast speeds as we saw when he escaped from HRG and the Haitian in Vegas. Well, it's not enough to just say, "Well, he can fly" and then have Mohinder distract you with five minutes of droning soliloquy that means nothing. So much would have to go into Nathan being able to fly. What is his bone structure like for him to be able to withstand velocities? How does he breathe in the thinning air of high altitudes? How does he see over distances and navigate so he knows where he's going? (Anyone who has been in a plane and looked out the window knows that the  world looks very different from the skies that it does on the ground.) What is his source of propulsion? Is he actually telekinetic? Hell, how didn't his pajama bottoms rip or tear right off while he was zooming across the sky? (I know, I know, same reason Bruce Banner's pants don't rip when he becomes the Hulk.) If Nathan is physically different as he has to be for his body to support flight, how hasn't it been discovered? He must have had medical exams. He's a public figure after all.

I remember when Fantastic Four came out in 2005 and Roger Ebert made a valid point about the Human Torch (paraphrasing): he can get hot enough to go supernova. That means he could destroy the whole planet. My God, what does that mean?! How would someone deal with that much destructive power? And Fantastic Four doesn't deal with it. "Flame on!" Fight Dr. Doom, goof on the Thing. It works on purely a childish level.

Heroes is supposed to be different. "Ordinary people discovering extraordinary abilities," right? It supposed to explore what it means to have special powers. For this to work, the Heroes should be a lot more curious about what they can do. I know I am. Claire was, and so was Hiro. That's why they were so awesome from the beginning. Peter, to his credit, is also curious. But Heroes bypasses a lot of the most interesting aspects of exploring what it means to have superpowers and plugs the characters into dumbass mysteries. Nothing about the "Save the Cheerleader" storyline was as interesting or exciting as those first scenes in the pilot of Claire exploring her healing or Hiro learning he can stop time. We need more of that shit on the show and that means better writing.

November 28, 2006

Who They Are And How They Came To Be

I've complained about Heroes a lot over the last ten weeks but I'll change my tune if every episode from here on in is like this week's. I thought "Six Months Ago" was real good. The secret origin of the Man They Call Sylar was well done. I liked how he resembles Clark Kent more than a little and the fact that he is/was a watchmaker, a cool homage to the origin of Dr. Manhattan in Watchmen.  I liked the story of how ne'er-do-well Eden fell under the sway of Horned Rimmed Glasses, whom I think should be the centerpiece of the show. I liked the secret origin of how Nathan's wife ended up in a wheelchair.

Locke:  My story didn't go down quite like that.

What a shame Mohinder's dad is dead as I think he's much more compelling than Mohinder himself. I liked the untold secret origin of how Claire became a cheerleader. And I liked the Hiro's tragic inability to save the cute redhead waitress no matter how much time traveling he did. Good stuff all around.

Certainly a big about-face from how I felt last week:

November 22, 2006

Rob: Have you seen Heroes?
John: I just saw it last night.
John: Unsatisfactory, I thought.
Rob: I was sad that Claire lost all her friends.  She should think about solving mysteries around her high school.
John: Only her rival died.
John: She's the queen bee again.
John: I liked Jessica Sanders going all Sarah Connor in T2 on her husband.
John: I think Mohinder is supposed to be Uatu the Watcher.  He's got the tremendously boring aspect of being a Watcher down.
Rob: Was it supposed to be a twist that Peter was going to mimic Claire's powers and be fine?  Because it seemed pretty clear that was going to happen.
John: Why didn't he mimic Sylar's powers and start hurling furniture at him?
John: It was only a shock to Peter and Claire, not to the viewers, that he'd heal.  The audience is way ahead of the characters in most circumstances, which denotes great writing .
Rob: I'm just glad the world has been saved.  I was worried.
John: How exactly was the world saved?
John: I'm not even sure Homecoming was saved.
Rob: Step one, save the cheerleader, step two, ?, step three, save the world.
John: I was thinking about what I would do to make Heroes more enjoyable (for me).  The writing and acting could be improved, better directing too, but if I had to fix just one thing straightaway, it would be that the narrative is stretched too thin between all these characters.  On Lost, there's a hierarchy.  Jack is the leader.  Kate, Sawyer, Locke, and Sayid balance him out but he's the top dog and we more or less follow his story primarily.  Same with The 4400, Tom and Diana are the focal point.  Heroes lacks that.  I'd make Claire's Dad the main guy and Claire his hot little unbreakable samurai.
John: Claire's dad is pretty interesting.
Rob: But he's "the face of evil."
John: Is he?  The narrator thinks it's Sylar now.
Rob: Oh, maybe I got that wrong.  It's hard to tell.
John: I think the narrator did change his mind this week about the face of evil. 
Rob: Well, there's room for two.  
Rob: I love Nathan Petrelli.  He's awfully skeptical for a guy who can fly.
John: Flying is for pussies, like his bro.
John: He's got an election to win.
Rob: His brother getting arrested for killing a cheerleader can't be helping.
John: I loved his method for saving the cheerleader:  Go inside high school, look at trophy case, talk to cheerleader, go outside, look at clock, go back inside.
Rob: To be fair, I can't imagine what I'd do in his situation.  
John: I would have been too distracted by talking to the cheerleader.

Finally, did you know there's already a Heroes Wiki ?  I didn't. 

October 17, 2006

Better. Much better. Things are moving along. Pairing up the characters was a shot in the arm. I liked Nathan and Nikki's liaison in Vegas. Peter and Mohinder were a lot more tolerable when they talked to each other. The reveal that Peter's power seems to be like Rogue (Marvel) or The Parasite (DC) was interesting. And I liked some of the dialogue this week: when Peter and Mohinder discussed being lesser versions of previous models (their fathers.) Watching this episode, I was sort of like the Emperor watching Luke fight Vader: "Good. Good."

But what about Claire Bennet? Every other Hero gets to meet a peer this week, but not her. Instead, the asshole rapist jock stripped her corpse naked, dragged her and left her in a ditch? Dude. That's some fucked up shit right there. Although when Claire pulled her chest back together, where'd her boobs go? (I know, I know, I'm scum.)

Hiro from the future? Cool.

I can't remember my complaints. I know I had some, but you know, they're not important. Thumbs up this week.

October 3, 2006

Monday Night Roar

A week ago, I wrote about Heroes. I wasn't complimentary but I was nicer than I could have been. Since the pilot debuted, I've been monitoring opinion on the Internet and I'm astounded at the amount of positive feedback. I must not be seeing the same show called Heroes that airs 9pm Mondays on NBC that the Heroes worshippers are getting. Maybe my DVR is receiving some alternate universe feed. The show called Heroes I've seen so far is pretty bad. Now that episode two has aired, things haven't improved any.

Holy Moly, is Heroes badly written! Badly, badly written, with crappy, obvious, pandering dialogue. The show is full of holes, inconsistencies and bad characterizations. For instance, in episode one, the younger brother spends the whole episode trying to convince his older brother he can fly. But when his friend the black girl tells him her friend the tortured artist thinks he can paint the future, he responds "That's impossible!" Oh what, flying is perfectly credible because he dreams it but prognostication isn't? Lots of people thoughout history have claimed they possess clairvoyence. It's not that unusual. No one can fly or has ever flown under their own power. The younger brother is a friggin' dope.

This week, Hiro stumbles upon the tortured artist killed by the serial killer. Hiro finds the artist by seeing his name in the comic book. What?! Show me any comic book creator in real life who publishes his name, address, and a picture of himself in the back page of his comic book! Who the hell would do that? No comic book creator wants comic book nerds showing up at their door. But Hiro does, and when he finds the murder scene and a gun lying on the ground, he picks the gun up?!?! Hiro may be Japanese but what kind of an idiot stumbles upon the scene of a murder and then immediately puts his prints on the potential murder weapon? Retarded.

Most retarded of all is Niki Sanders: what's going on there makes no sense. So her murderous mirror self possess her and does stuff she can't remember? Fine, whatever, but why does Niki bring her son with her in the middle of the night to bury the bodies of the mobsters in the trunk. Sure, the kid is asleep but what if he wakes up and sees his mom digging a shallow grave? And doesn't anyone smell the corpses in the trunk or is the trunk of a Cadillac odor-proof?It's just stupid and lacking any logic. The whole Niki storyline is stupid.

The only decent plotline so far besides Hiro teleporting was Claire Bennet and her evil stepfather -- until her friend with the camcorder suddenly tells her the tape he made disappeared. Then we find Evil Stepfather has it. So the Evil Stepfather somehow learned about and then took the time and effort to locate where the teenage boy hid the tape and procured it? That's the kind of nonsense logic we find in Smallville, where a billionaire like Lionel Luthor spends his days dropping by Smallville High School and threatening 17 year old Chloe Sullivan in the school newspaper room. Stuff like that doesn't make sense. It's hard to care about any of these characters when they behave like idiots.

Great Krypton, is this one badly acted show! Just about all of the actors are terrible. Greg Grunberg, Adrian Pasdar, and Hayden Panettiere are not bad actors (and Panettiere is sure as hell not bad looking; she's the hottest piece of forbidden jail bait on network TV) but they sure are being badly directed. Just last episode, Claire Bennet had a Southern accent: "Ah walked through fahr and didn't get burned." This week, no accent. Her father doesn't have one, neither do her friends. The Indian was probably the worst actor on the show until his title was stolen by the neighbor who showed up to hang out with him in his dead dad's apartment.

And by all the stars in Orion's belt, is the voice over narration by the professor from India horrible! He prattles on and on Charles Xavier-style (but without Xavier's style) about "genetic evolution" and "God" and whatever else, asking all these rhetorical questions that have no direct correlation with the action in the episodes. Tim Kring, the creator and writer, has no idea how to write science fiction. He sucks at it. He doesn't have any idea that in science fiction, the first thing you do is establish the rules. In The Terminator, Kyle Reese explains how time travel works so the audience knows they can only go backwards and not forwards. He explains what the Terminator is so we know its abilities and limits. In Star Wars Obi-Wan Kenobi sits Luke Skywalker down and explains how the Force works, what it is, what a lightsaber is, etc. Instead of the rhetorical garbage the Indian narrates in his voice over, Kring could instead use this device to explain the rules of how the Heroes' powers work so we're not scratching our heads wondering what's up with evil mirror stripper or how someone can fly (or levitate) with no visible means of propulsion. But no, Kring doesn't do that. Why? Because Heroes has to be mysterious -- it has to be like Lost. This show is so desperate to be Lost. Kring sure studied his Lost DVDs, took copious notes, and did as much as he could to monkey-see-monkey-do what makes Lost work. And he's crap at it. I'm really disappointed with Heroes so far. The basic concept has such potential but it's being heroically screwed up.

September 26, 2006

Heroes of the Hour

Yesterday morning, Reuters ran an article with the headline: "NBC has hit on its hands with 'Heroes.'" That's a pretty clairvoyant bit of "news reporting" considering Heroes hadn't actually aired on television yet. There's already spin out there trying to turn Heroes into the next big thing, the next Lost. Heroes would certainly not exist were it not for Lost. I've seen the pilot for Heroes twice now, once on my laptop weeks ago and again on NBC HD via my DVR. I'm here to say: Heroes is okay. It's not bad. It could be pretty good eventually but it's nowhere near there yet. Heroes is sure as hell no Lost. The pilot for Heroes is not even close to being as nail-bitingly suspensful, compelling, fascinating, riveting, well-acted, well-written, or well directed as the pilot for Lost was. Still, there's enough raw material that could turn Heroes into a good sci-fi mythology show in time. Unfortunately, there's an equal abundance of negatives that could send the Heroes into the "complete series" DVD rest home for failed Lost ripoffs currently harboring Invasion, Threshold, and Surface.

The one hour pilot is rumored to actually have been a two hour pilot cut in half by NBC. NBC actually seems to be doing more than its share to fuck up Heroes. The guy doing the spooky whispery voice over during the promos is fucking annoying, and even worse are his promises that "extraordinary" things are going to happen. Yeah, why don't you let me and the rest of the audience be the judge of that, pal. Cutting the pilot in half meant that not all of the main characters were introduced in the first episode. The promos tell us already that Greg Grunberg, the cop, has telepathy. And that it's "extraordinary." As for that black guy in the picture above, don't know who the hell he is. I guess we'll meet him next week. And I bet he'll be "extraordinary." We meet all the other Heroes in episode one (or Volume One as the rotten title crawl calls it) but I wouldn't want to be stuck on a mysterious island with more than a couple of them.

That couple of characters, the highlights of this show so far, are Hayden Panettiere as Claire Bennet, an unbreakable Texas cheerleader, and Masi Oka as Hiro Nakamura, a nerdy Japanese office drone who can teleport. Oka is the stand in for all the nerds watching this show: He watches Star Trek, reads X-Men comics (a way too obvious and pandering nod to the source material this show is aggressively swiping its concepts from), and wants to have superpowers. Hiro annoys the shit out of his more practical best friend with his rants about being able to bend the space-time continuum. And his friend has a point: how does teleporting earn him money and get him laid? (Answer: become a Villain). Hiro won't shut the fuck up about wanting to be "special" and there's a cool scene where he manages to teleport from a Tokyo subway into the middle of Times Square and joyously freaks. Panettiere is the exact opposite; her Wolverine-esque ability to heal from any mortal injury bums her out for some reason. But at least both characters are interested in their powers and are trying to figure out how they work. Claire Bennet throws herself off of high places and gruesomely mangles her hot little cheerleader body in various ways to test how much she can heal herself. Claire is also the first Hero who does something heroic, selflessly rushing into a flaming overturned train in her cheerleader costume to save a man about to burn to death. That makes sense; traditionally superheroes start out young, when they are still idealistic. Panettiere reminds me of Sarah Michelle Gellar ten years ago. She has potential to portray a really good teenage female superhero if the writers let her.

And that's the main problem with Heroes so far, the writing. Also, the acting, but first the writing. It's pretty lousy. Show creator Tim Kring penned the pilot and he's out of his depth writing sci-fi. Clunky exposition and crap dialogue abound, with a headache-inducing number of times being "special" is referenced by various characters. It's almost "extraordinary" how lousy the dialogue is. The Indian genetics professor-turned cabdriver/narrator, let's call him Sayid #2, is the biggest offender. He bookends the show with nonsensical voice over narration and prattles on about "the next step in genetic evolution" already being here. Whatever. Patrick Stewart can make all that "evolution" mumbo-jumbo speechifying sound almost plausible, or at least less implausible, but Sayid #2 ain't no Charles Xavier. A stripper who doesn't actually strip (Ali Larter, who could stand to gain ten pounds and try on another whip cream bikini, as Niki Sanders) having an Incredible Hulk alter ego she can see in the mirror that kills her enemies isn't the next step in genetic evolutionary anything. That's just nonsense from dumb asses who've skimmed a couple of bad comic books trying to sound smart and profound. The good news is Heroes does have good writers sitting in their writers room, like Jeph Loeb (Lost) and Bryan Fuller (Wonderfalls, Dead Like Me). This show should turn out okay if Kring backs off and lets them to their thing.

The acting ain't great all around. Besides Panettiere and Oka, only Adrian Pasdar distinguises himself as Nathan Petrelli, an oily candidate for senator who it turns out is the man who can fly his younger brother has been dreaming about. Everyone else, Nathan's whiny younger brother, the tormented artist who sees the Heroes's futures and paints them, the tortured artist's girlfriend, Niki Sanders's black son, and Sayid #2, all in their own way blow. There are a couple of scenes with Claire Bennet's dog-breeding adoptive mother that are so badly conceived and performed they'd be practically unwatchable were it not for Panettiere being so watchable. Meanwhile, it looks like Claire Bennet's adoptive father is evil and has some nefarious plans in mind for the fledgling Heroes. The evil father might himself have teleportation powers that would make Hiro jealous; he got in a New York taxi cab driven by Sayid #2 sometime late in the day but somehow made it home to Odessa, Texas by dinner time. Sayid #2 came to New York to discover who killed his own father, yet when Evil Mr. Bennet started making cryptic comments from the backseat of the taxi cab, Sayid #2's response is to hit the breaks, bolt out of the cab, and run like hell instead of confront his mysterious passenger with the questions he traveled halfway around the world to find answers to. Retarded.

I might have dropped Heroes already just from the disappointing aspects of the pilot, but I'm just not wired that way, damn it. People discovering superpowers and maybe using them to fight some unforseen, apocalyptic evil isn't something I can readily turn my back on. I'm on board. I want to see where this is going. I'm hoping it's somewhere half as "extraordinary" as the promos keep hyping.

There's a foreboding eclipse coming, which could bring badness. If Eclipso shows up, that would be super sweet. Maybe the Heroes should draw some plans, mine some metals, and build themselves a watchtower on the moon.