|
|
SERENITY
June 24, 2005
You Can't Stop The Signal
When Serenity started, I tried to put aside all of my previous
knowledge about Firefly and mentally approach the material
as if I were seeing it for the first time. If this thing cant
stand on its on as a movie, its dead on arrival. I liked the
opening scenes the voice over narration establishing the
futuristic concept, and I really liked the Alice in Wonderland reality
within reality of opening in a flashback, which was a dream of Rivers,
which was then revealed as a hologram recording of how Simon freed
River from the Alliance. That was a question I never really thought
about before how did Simon free her? but I was pleasantly
surprised we got the answer. I really liked the Assassin (there
were no credits so I dont know his character name, if any.)
I expected that the concept of Blue Sun and the hands of blue would
be swept aside and it was the right move since theres already
more than enough to explain to a general audience. But in this opening
we ran into my first complaint, which is I cant understand
why that girl who played young River was cast. She looks nothing
like Summer Glau and her performance and that entire scene
were overly contrived. Bad casting that took me right out of the
movie moments after it started.
The first act felt like another episode but thats not a negative
comment. It was clear from the very beginning that this was Joss
Whedon writing and directing, that the characters were indeed
back, that this was Firefly. It seemed like there was never
a 3 year gap from when we saw them last. Its rare to see such
a pure recreation of something thought to be lost for good, but
unlike say, the ECW One Night Stand pay per view, which was
purely a recreation, this was much more of an organic continuation.
I thought the character reveals, the arcs established, the interpersonal
conflicts were generally clear and well done, as were the simultaneous
camera reveals of the layout and rooms of Serenity herself, which
is also a character and as important as the human characters. There
was a lot of dialogue here and all throughout the picture, which
is Whedons greatest strength and one of the biggest drawbacks
in finding a mass audience. There are few movies in the action or
sci-fi genre where characters talk as much as they do here. For
those not familiar or fond of Whedons style, it will be a
lot to process. But fuck them for now; for me, it was great to see
everyone again. The desire to see these characters we love as we
remember them was instantly met and that was the first gratification
of the movie. The early set up of Simons Dramatic Need, to
keep River out of harms way, was prominent and worked very
well. His desire to keep his sister safe is the strongest idea in
this part and the one easiest to relate to.
Seeing the dreaded, cannibalistic Reavers at long last didnt
disappoint, nor did the first major action sequence involving Mal,
Zoe, Jayne and River escaping from the Reavers. Jaynes leg
being speared also worked as the litmus test for the level of violence
Joss was going for, which would be considerable and quite shocking
in volume and veracity as the movie continued. Once we got to the
planet where River and Simon were supposed to leave the ship, we
hit my second major complaint: Kung Fu River.

See, I never equated River Tam with Buffy Summers. River
is River, she has next to nothing in common with Buffy, and she
shouldnt be Buffy. River is a tortured genius psychic and
while she has displayed amazing acrobatic prowess, turning her into
a kung fu fighting machine was not something I necessarily wanted
to see out of her character. To me, Kung Fu River was more disappointing
than exciting because while I understand the need from a conceptual
and an action viewpoint for her to fight, River doing acrobatic
martial arts is too derivative. A young girl with superpowered kung
fu has been done, by Whedon on TV, and by many others in movies.
Its not unique and its not new. When River was shown
doing the kung fu in the trailer, I never liked it. I also dont
like the circumstances for Rivers first fight scene. River
wanders into the bar, is drawn by the subliminal message cartoon
the Alliance planted and is triggered to reveal herself and her
fighting prowess is activated. I got that. What I didnt understand
is why the people River was fighting were suddenly doing so. What
was the motivation of all those people to attack River one-by-one
black ninja style? When she walked into the bar, they were all sitting,
drinking, and minding their own business. Suddenly, they were all
on their feet attacking her. Why?
The fact that River is psychic and a mind reader was what made
her a threat to the Alliance. Her telepathy was used early when
she, Mal, Jayne and Zoe broke into the cash vault before the Reavers
arrived, but it was never used effectively again. When River turned
into Bruce Lee, that became the focus of why she was dangerous.
While there is a level of coolness to River being a fighting machine,
it doesnt make sense. Shes a tiny, skinny girl. How
strong could she be? How does her psychic power translate into her
being able to hit men twice her size hard enough to knock them out?
Sarah Michelle Gellar is also tiny but Buffy has magical
super strength so there is an outlet to explain how she can fight.
It doesnt make as much sense for River, although Summer Glau,
who was a prima ballerina in real life, moves more fluidly and gracefully
than Sarah Gellar ever could. Rivers fight scenes have an
appropriate ballet quality, but vicious and intense. I know Sean
is an Inara man, and I totally understand that, but Im crazy
in love with the River character and with Summer Glau. God, she
is gorgeous and shes gotten more beautiful at 23 than she
was at 19.
When Inara sent Mal a wave and Mal decided to take Serenity and
come get her, I immediately cried a mental foul since Inara would
never betray Mal and the others, even if an eloquent black space
assassin was leaning on her. I was enormously pleased when Mal and
the entire crew clearly saw it was a trap thats smart
writing and it makes the audience and the characters share in being
equally smart. I did note that only a fleeting reference was made
to Inara being a Companion, and what that is, and whatnot was assiduously
avoided. I can understand that the concept of legal and respectable
prostitution, even in deep space in the future, is a hard sell to
the general public. Establishing Inara as a prostitute would instantly
turn a mass audience against her. As such, she was just a woman
who used to be on the ship and Mal and Inara clearly love each other,
but theres too much going on already so its right the
Companion stuff had to go. Still, it reduces Inara to just being
a beautiful woman who lacks a function and reason for being beyond
a love interest for Mal thats never consummated.
I really liked the visit with Shepherd Book on Haven where the
last word was spoken on whether well ever find out what Books
mysterious secret past is: No. Well never find out. And thats
okay with me, I understand why and itll be more fun to imagine
the answer from here on in. (Just like how I never, ever want to
know what became of Angel in that alley - unless there is
an Angel movie.) I didnt like how Mal told Book he
always sought counsel from him; thats not quite the way it
went. Mal never wanted to hear Books advice, so that rang
a bit false.
The big mystery solved, what River knew that the Alliance wanted
silenced, and the secret origin of the Reavers was just terrific.
Again, like how Simon saved River, a question I never even knew
I wanted answered was, and that was awesome. I thought it was a
really good pot of gold at the end of the rainbow; it was different,
and it was a big deal given what was established throughout the
movie.
The villainous Assassin hunting River was a tremendous character.
I also liked the clear philosophical differences established between
Mal and the Assassin. All that stuff that they talked about in between
and during their slugfests: faith, loyalty, love, what kind of world
is ideal and what the costs and worth of creating such a world would
be. Genuine ideas that drive the characters motivations, complicates
them, challenges them, forces them to question themselves and reaffirm
who they are. We just dont see such things in todays
genre movies. To its credit, Serenity had a lot more on its
mind.
The third act was shockingly violent. Again, I draw parallels to
the ECW pay per view, the unlikeliest thing Serenity could
be related to but they have more in common than it seems. Both Serenity
and ECW are led by charismatic, balding geniuses within their entertainment
genres (Whedon and Paul Heyman) who are indebted to multi-million-dollar
mega conglomerates. Both had their pet franchise projects, which
in their own ways turned their genres on their sides, ended before
their time. Both have legions of loyal, cult followers who bemoan
the state of their genres and cry out for a return of the brand
of their genre they love. Both are comprised of performers who feel
passionately about their characters, product, and the fans, and
yearned to return. Both Serenity and ECW received phoenix-like
resurrections this year to reward all those loyal, emotional, grateful
fans, with the possibility of a continuation based on the performance
of the resurrected franchise.

Given the stakes established and the dangers they faced, the third
act was more violent than I could have imagined. The last sci-fi
movie I can remember that was as bloody and unrelentingly, unapologetically
violent was Robocop. There hasnt been any sci-fi at
this level of violence in many years, and because the characters
are so talkative and funny, the violence blindsides you because
you never expect it, even though the rules of the universe are plainly
established. The desperation and the ferocity of the fighting for
survival by every character was palpable. Its funny that Joss
may never be known as an action director, because hes a very
good one and he plays for keeps with his characters. They are never
safe, there is no feeling that everything will turn out all right
in the end, that only the bad people will be punished and perish.
He pushed this as far as I think he can push and I admire his resolve.
Mal getting skewered in the gut, Simon getting shot and Zoe getting
her back sliced open were effective red herrings. The deus ex machina
of River killing the Reavers was held off a bit too long when it
was apparent from her first kung fu fight scene that killing those
monster men was what she was made for. It brings her fighting ability
into justification shes a weapon, so of course, what
else but the Reavers could River have been made a weapon to fight
against? It worked overall and River looked cool fighting and posed
in victory over the Reavers corpses, but again, its
derivative and obvious. A more interesting resolution would be her
psychic ability coming into play somehow I dont know
how but it's too Buffyesque that a young girl kung fu fighting can
solve all your monster problems. Joss has mined that to death already.
Wash and Book dying. Books death was not unexpected and it
was sad but he went out in a brave, heroic way. No one could have
expected he wouldnt be the only one to go. Books death
was the right move; on an ongoing series he has a place as a moral
center, but in the movie he was an extraneous character. Books
death was more than enough sadness but it was only a decoy. The
death of Wash was one of the ballsiest moves Ive ever seen
from something in this genre. The fact that it comes out of nowhere,
the speed, impact and the permanence of it, the fact that there
is no resuscitation, no magical coming back to life, not even any
parting words as he died was unbelievable. I'm not sure if I like
that it was done but Joss killing Wash off was a hell of a move.
Overall, I think it was a good move because of all of the Serenity
crewmembers, he was always the one least cut out for a life of crime
(one can argue Simon is as well, but Simon is still learning and
growing while Wash was set and stagnant). Wash was the funny comic
relief, everyone loved him and he served a specific purpose as the
pilot. With his sudden death the perception that because Wash was
the pilot and he usually doesn't leave Serenity that hes safe
was instantly shattered.
Another problem created by Wash's death is Zoe's behavior. Zoes
lack of any reaction to her husband dying was awkward. I understand
she is a soldier, they had a job to do and odds are they were all
moments away from joining Wash in death when the Reavers arrive,
but she took Washs death far better than anyone in the audience
did. Some sort of reaction, of release, would have been more appropriate,
at least from the standpoint of emotional completeness. Charging
headlong at the Reavers and nearly getting her back sliced in half
isn't enough. However, I did note that the movie did not clearly
define that they were in fact husband and wife obviously
as fans of the show we know but the general audience may not have
been significantly clued in, and thus Joss has some wriggle room
to explain Zoes lack of emotion to her husband dying.
One of the major storylines, carried over from Firefly and
re-established by Kaylee in act one when she admonished Mal for
never making Simon and River feel like a part of the family, came
full circle. In Serenity, Simon and River finally and truly
became part of Mal's crew, the family, but room had to be made for
them and Wash had to be the one to go. Simon as the doctor had a
function on the ship, but River needed one. Taking Washs role
as the person who flies Serenity was the logical choice. It was
established in Objects In Space and fleetingly touched
upon in scenes where River would be intimately pressed against parts
of the ship that she has a tactile relationship with Serenity. With
Wash gone and Serenity finally truly becoming her home, its
fitting that River becomes the one to fly her.
My issues aside, I loved Serenity. It was a joy being with
these characters again and going on one more ride with them. When
the screening let out, I wanted to turn around, buy another ticket
and immediately see it again, if only that were possible. It is
instantly one of my favorite movies. Not of the year.
I mean period. I have no idea how it will do theatrically upon its
release. I just cant conjecture. There is more than enough
action, humor and fun that a general audience might enjoy the movie.
It has many unique yet familiar qualities and it has the benefit
of being quite unlike anything else out there. On the other hand,
there are so many things that could turn off a general audience.
My feeling is if you have an affinity for science fiction action
movies, there is enough here to engage you even if youve never
heard of Firefly. But its also very easy to anticipate
people being turned off or uninterested. It will be interesting
to see how Universal markets it at the end of the summer. The ball
is really in their court to get asses into the seats and sell this
thing to the general audience. I cant wait to see it again,
especially when the effects are done, the final sound is mixed,
and the picture is cut down a bit and tightened. I didnt have
any issues with the sound, edits and effects as they were
it was enough to convey what was needed, but Ill be very excited
to see Serenitys final cut. Whether or not the box
office exceeds $40 million domestically, which is a reasonable estimate,
Serenity will do gangbuster DVD business. It will ultimately
be determined more by the DVD sales than by its theatrical numbers
whether Serenity will ever fly again.
I cant hope for more, especially since we never should have
had this movie to begin with, but as a final chapter, its
a beautiful way to go out. And if by some second stroke of unbelievable
fate there is another movie or something else that brings Joss and
these actors back together, Serenity is still the last time
we will ever see Firefly again as we knew it and loved it
from the show. Firefly-That-Was will never be again.
Anything more will be very different by design.
- John Orquiola

|